This is an AI-generated summary of a selected monitored public legal source and may omit context. It is general information only, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for reading the source or consulting an attorney.
AI summary
The Supreme Court of Appeal considered an appeal about a claim for payment of an adjusted purchase price under a sectional title purchase agreement. It dealt with whether the total base development cost had to be referred to a quantity surveyor as expert, and whether a schedule recording that determination was admissible as evidence. The appeal was dismissed with costs, including the costs of two counsel.
It may be relevant to property development and contract disputes involving adjusted purchase prices, quantity surveyor determinations, and hearsay objections.
Evidence from source
The appeal is dismissed with costs, including the costs of two counsel.
Supports: Summary sentence 3