The High Court in Pretoria gave reasons for discharging an interim rule nisi that had granted anti-dissipation and mandatory relief over two bank accounts. The judgment records that the Applicant had alleged unauthorised removal of viewing access and argued for confirmation or extension of the order, but the Court found no evidence of an intention to dissipate funds and no basis for a final mandatory interdict. The Court also ordered the Applicant to pay the costs of the application.
This judgment may be relevant to parties dealing with bank account access, anti-dissipation relief, and interim interdicts in commercial disputes.
Evidence from source
The rule nisi interim containing the interim relief granted in paragraphs 3.1, 3.2, 3.4 and 3.5 of the order of 24 July 2026 is discharged.
Supports: plain summary: the Court discharged the interim rule nisi and related relief.
The date for hand-down is deemed to be 30 September 2026.
Supports: deadline detection: the judgment states an explicit calendar date.