This is an AI-generated summary of a selected monitored public legal source and may omit context. It is general information only, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for reading the source or consulting an attorney.
AI summary
The Supreme Court of Appeal considered two review applications about Taxing Master allocaturs under rule 17 of the SCA Rules. The court dealt with objections about attorney fees, perusal charges, counsel’s fees, communications, copying and attendances, and dismissed both review applications with costs.
This may be relevant to litigants and practitioners dealing with taxation of costs, especially where attorney in person claims, correspondence attorney charges, and counsel’s fees are disputed.
Evidence from source
The applications for review of taxation are dismissed with costs.
Supports: Summary of the outcome.
This matter concerns two separate reviews of the Taxing Master’s allocaturs under rule 17 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Appeal (the SCA rules).
Supports: Summary of the subject matter.