The High Court heard an appeal about an eviction order involving a property in Koringberg and the circumstances in which it had been sold, leased back, and occupied by the respondents. The judgment records disputes about a water use licence, shareholding arrangements, and related agreements, and says the eviction order is suspended for 180 days while the parties negotiate and, failing agreement, may institute legal proceedings.
It may be relevant to eviction proceedings and disputes involving water use licences, trust arrangements, and the court's treatment of what is just and equitable.
Evidence from source
the parties engage in bona fide negotiations for the resolution of their disputes.
Supports: Summary claim that the parties must negotiate during the suspension period.
the respondents shall institute any legal proceedings for any relief to which they may be entitled, within thirty (30) days of the expiry of the first thirty (30) day period from the date of this order;
Supports: Summary claim that legal proceedings may follow if no agreement is reached.