This is an AI-generated summary of a selected monitored public legal source and may omit context. It is general information only, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for reading the source or consulting an attorney.
AI summary
The High Court dealt with an urgent application about trusteeship of the Douglas Ziman Trust. It dismissed Part A, which sought to stop the Master from authorising the second to fourth respondents to act as trustees, and ordered the applicants to pay the costs of Part A. The judgment sets out the trust deed provisions, the sequence of trustee appointments, and the court's reasons for finding the applicants' prospects weak.
This may be relevant to trust administration and trustee appointment disputes involving the Douglas Ziman Trust.
Evidence from source
The Trust Deed makes careful provision for the mechanisms by which trustees are to be appointed. The second to fourth respondents have been appointed in accordance with the Trust Deed, have become trustees, and are awaiting authorisation by
Supports: Summary sentence 3