This is an AI-generated summary of a selected monitored public legal source and may omit context. It is general information only, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for reading the source or consulting an attorney.
AI summary
The court dealt with three interlocutory applications in ongoing litigation between Bethesda Christian Center and World Outreach and others. It set aside the seventh respondent’s answering affidavit as an irregular step, upheld a Rule 7 challenge to the respondents’ authority, and granted an application to strike out specified paragraphs as scandalous, vexatious and irrelevant.
This may be relevant to parties dealing with authority challenges, irregular steps, and striking-out applications in motion proceedings.
Evidence from source
The following paragraphs contained in the respondents' answering affidavit are hereby struck out as scandalous, vexatious, and irrelevant: 2.4; 2.6; 2.7;
Supports: Plain summary sentence 2: the court granted the striking out application.