This is an AI-generated summary of a selected monitored public legal source and may omit context. It is general information only, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for reading the source or consulting an attorney.
AI summary
The Constitutional Court dealt with three leave to appeal applications arising from a dispute about a municipality’s consent to a change in control of Silulumanzi under a concession contract. It held that leave to appeal was granted in two matters, the appeals succeeded, and the High Court order was set aside and replaced. The Court also recorded that the appeal turned on whether the conduct was reviewable under PAJA or legality and on unreasonable delay.
This may be relevant to administrative law and municipal contract disputes, especially where the source concerns PAJA, legality review and delay.
Evidence from source
Summary: Review — Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000 — definition of “administrative action” — Municipality’s decision not taken “in terms of any legislation”
Supports: plain_summary sentence 3
The appeals in Cases CCT 11/25 and CCT 12/25 succeed. 4. The order of the Supreme Court of Appeal is set aside and the following order is substituted in its place
Supports: plain_summary sentence 2