This is an AI-generated summary of a selected monitored public legal source and may omit context. It is general information only, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for reading the source or consulting an attorney.
AI summary
The court dealt with an opposed interlocutory application to compel a reply to a Uniform Rule 35(3) notice in pending proceedings between Custom Capital Finance and several respondents. It discussed relevance, possession and control of the documents sought, and the form of the response required under the rule.
This may be relevant to civil litigation involving Rule 35 discovery disputes and the form of compliance with a rule 35(3) notice.
Evidence from source
This is an opposed interlocutory application to compel the respondents to reply to the applicant’s notice delivered in the action under Uniform Rule 35(3).
Supports: Summary sentence 1
The order must also accommodate a respondent who holds a relevant document but objects to producing it.
Supports: Summary sentence 2
The first to fifth respondents are directed to comply, within 10 (ten) days of service of this order, with the applicant's notice in terms of Uniform Rule 35(3) dated 7 April 2025.
Supports: Deadline-related claim