The High Court dealt with an application concerning alleged spoliation of an immovable property in Waterkloof, Pretoria, and the removal of a work laptop and personal belongings. The court recorded that an interim protection order had been obtained in the Magistrate’s Court, but it found that the applicant was still not in undisturbed possession when the matter was heard. The order required restoration of possession, return of items, and payment of costs on an attorney and client scale.
This may be relevant to litigation and family law practitioners, and appears to concern spoliation relief, interim protection orders, and costs.
Evidence from source
the applicant was unlawfully deprived of her peaceful possession of an immovable property situated at 3[...] D[...] Road, Waterkloof, Pretoria (“the property”) and of some of her personal items
Supports: plain_summary sentence 1