This is an AI-generated summary of a selected monitored public legal source and may omit context. It is general information only, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for reading the source or consulting an attorney.
AI summary
The court dealt with an application for leave to appeal after dismissing a contempt application based on clause 2.5 of a prior court order. The judgment records that the applicant had not established a breach of the order and that the leave to appeal application was dismissed with costs. It also records that wasted costs for 16 April 2026 were payable by Mrs Faucitt.
This may be relevant to disputes about leave to appeal, contempt applications, and costs orders arising from family business litigation.
Evidence from source
The applicant brought an application based on contempt of clause 2.5 of a court order granted by Khumalo J on 19 August 2025. I dismissed the application on the grounds that the applicant did not establish a breach of the court order
Supports: plain_summary sentence 1
In the premises the application for leave to appeal must fail.
Supports: plain_summary sentence 2
Mrs Faucitt is to pay the wasted costs of 16 April 2026 on a party and party scale, Scale C.
Supports: plain_summary sentence 3