This is an AI-generated summary of a selected monitored public legal source and may omit context. It is general information only, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for reading the source or consulting an attorney.
AI summary
The Supreme Court of Appeal considered an application for special leave to appeal and condonation in a matter about prescription and cessioned claims. It recorded that the claims arose from payments made under void magistrates' court judgments, and held that the applications were dismissed with costs.
This appears to concern prescription, cessioned claims and special leave procedure, which may be relevant to litigation and debt recovery matters.
Evidence from source
The applications for condonation and for special leave to appeal are dismissed with costs.
Supports: Outcome of the application
the judgments were therefore, in law, void ab initio (from the outset).
Supports: Background fact about the underlying judgments