This is an AI-generated summary of a selected monitored public legal source and may omit context. It is general information only, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for reading the source or consulting an attorney.
AI summary
The Constitutional Court refused leave to appeal in a matter about the Cape Gannet and Scharrig investments, including issues described as the no-conflict and no-profit rules, disgorgement of profits, and the in duplum rule. It also recorded that the High Court and the Supreme Court of Appeal had treated the relevant claims as liquidated amounts and had dismissed the secret profits claim.
This appears to concern fiduciary accounting, secret profits, and interest on claims arising from a statement and debatement process.
Evidence from source
Summary: no-conflict rule — no-profit rule — disgorgement of profits in duplum rule — development of common law — liquidated claims — statement and debatement of accounts
Supports: The issues identified in the judgment summary.
1. Leave to appeal is refused.
Supports: The order made by the Constitutional Court.