This is an AI-generated summary of a selected monitored public legal source and may omit context. It is general information only, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for reading the source or consulting an attorney.
AI summary
The judgment concerns an application to confirm a rule nisi where the applicant attached an actuarial report to a supplementary founding affidavit. The court held that the report was not properly before it and discharged the rule nisi.
This may be relevant to practitioners dealing with motion proceedings, expert material and the filing of actuarial evidence.
Evidence from source
The rule nisi is discharged. (b) The applicant to pay the costs, including costs of counsel on scale C.
Supports: The order made by the court
The issue turns on the admissibility into evidence, of an actuarial report attached to the applicants supplementary founding affidavit.
Supports: The subject matter of the judgment
I am not persuaded to confirm the rule nisi , and I make the order.
Supports: The court’s conclusion