This is an AI-generated summary of a selected monitored public legal source and may omit context. It is general information only, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for reading the source or consulting an attorney.
AI summary
The judgment concerns an application for leave to appeal against a costs order made after an urgent application was struck from the roll for want of urgency. The Court granted condonation for the late filing, but dismissed the leave to appeal application and ordered the Applicant to pay the costs of that application.
It may be relevant to family law and civil litigation matters involving leave to appeal, urgent applications, and costs orders.
Evidence from source
On 11 December 2025, this Court struck the Applicant’s urgent application from the roll for want of urgency and ordered him to pay the Respondent’s costs as between attorney and client.
Supports: Summary sentence 1
In the premises, this Court grants condonation for the late delivery of the application for leave to appeal.
Supports: Summary sentence 2
The application for leave to appeal against the costs order of 11 December 2025 is dismissed.
Supports: Summary sentence 2