This is an AI-generated summary of a selected monitored public legal source and may omit context. It is general information only, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for reading the source or consulting an attorney.
AI summary
The judgment concerns an application about discovery under Uniform Rule 35 and the filing of a financial disclosure form in a divorce matter. The court says the respondent did not comply with the Rule 35 notices and ordered him to file an answer and his financial disclosure form within 10 days of service of the order, with costs on the attorney and client scale.
It may be relevant to practitioners following Rule 35 discovery issues and financial disclosure form compliance in divorce proceedings.
Evidence from source
The respondent is to file an answer to the applicant’s notice in terms of Uniform Rule 35(1),(6),(8) and (10) within 10 (ten) days from the date of service of this order.
Supports: plain_summary: order to file an answer to the Rule 35 notice within 10 days.
The respondent is to file his financial disclosure form within 10 (ten) days from the date of service of this order.
Supports: plain_summary: order to file the financial disclosure form within 10 days.
The respondent is to pay the costs of this application on the scale as between attorney and client.
Supports: plain_summary: costs order on the attorney and client scale.