This is an AI-generated summary of a selected monitored public legal source and may omit context. It is general information only, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for reading the source or consulting an attorney.
AI summary
The judgment deals with an application for leave to appeal in Khoza v First Rand Bank Limited and Others. Wilson J said the proposed appeal against the 14 July 2026 order would be moot, and dismissed the application for leave to appeal against both orders. The court also made a de bonis propriis costs order against Mr Malatji, with counsel’s costs taxed on scale B.
This appears to concern appellate procedure and costs orders in a High Court matter involving a bank, the Road Accident Fund, and a sheriff.
Evidence from source
On 29 September 2026, I dismissed an application for leave to appeal against both orders, purportedly brought on Ms. Khoza’s behalf.
Supports: plain_summary: the application for leave to appeal was dismissed against both orders
any appeal against the 14 July 2026 order would have no practical effect or result.
Supports: plain_summary: the proposed appeal was described as moot
I agreed that Mr. Malatji should pay the costs of the application for leave to appeal de bonis propriis .
Supports: plain_summary: costs order against Mr Malatji