This is an AI-generated summary of a selected monitored public legal source and may omit context. It is general information only, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for reading the source or consulting an attorney.
AI summary
The Supreme Court of Appeal dealt with an application under section 17(2)(f) of the Superior Courts Act for reconsideration of a refusal of special leave to appeal. It held that the threshold was not met and struck the application from the roll with costs. The judgment also records the background of a dispute about a claim against the Legal Practitioners' Indemnity Insurance Fund arising from payment into a fraudulent account.
It may be relevant to statutory indemnity insurance, section 17(2)(f) reconsideration applications, and disputes involving claims against legal practitioners.
Evidence from source
The application for reconsideration is struck from the roll with costs, including the costs of two counsel where so employed and the costs of all applications for leave to appeal.
Supports: plain_summary sentence 2