This is an AI-generated summary of a selected monitored public legal source and may omit context. It is general information only, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for reading the source or consulting an attorney.
AI summary
The judgment concerns costs after a purported withdrawal of Rule 30 and Rule 30A applications. The court dismissed those applications with costs, ordering that the costs be paid by Mr Reyno Dawid De Beer personally on the attorney and client scale, including the costs of two counsel. The court also recorded that the Liberty Fighters Network was not properly before the court, but the order did not prevent enforcement against its assets if it has any.
It may be relevant to parties dealing with withdrawal of applications, Rule 30 and 30A procedure, and costs orders in High Court litigation.
Evidence from source
This judgment concerns the costs consequences of a purported withdrawal of interlocutory applications brought under Uniform Rules 30 and 30A
Supports: Summary sentence 1
In the result the following order is made: The applicants’ applications in terms of Uniform Rules 30 and 30A are dismissed with costs.
Supports: Summary sentence 2
Such costs shall be paid by the second applicant, Mr Reyno Dawid De Beer, de bonis propriis (personally). The costs shall be on the attorney-and-client scale.
Supports: Summary sentence 2