The High Court considered an application for leave to appeal in a matter between Linburg Engineering and its former employee, Ms Ursula Moela. The court said the grounds advanced had no merit and dismissed the application with costs, including costs of counsel on scale B. The judgment discusses the earlier urgent application, the interim order of 27 January 2026, and the arguments about contempt of court and costs.
This appears to concern contempt proceedings, interpretation of court orders, and costs in a leave to appeal application.
Evidence from source
This is an application for leave to appeal (‘Leave to Appeal’) against a judgment handed down or order made on 17 March 2026 dismissing an urgent application by Linburg Engineering
Supports: Plain summary: the matter concerned an application for leave to appeal after an urgent application was dismissed.
Therefore, the Leave to Appeal will be dismissed with costs. I will award costs of counsel on scale B.
Supports: Plain summary: the application was dismissed with costs, including counsel on scale B.