This is an AI-generated summary of a selected monitored public legal source and may omit context. It is general information only, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for reading the source or consulting an attorney.
AI summary
The High Court in Johannesburg dealt with an application for leave to appeal by Maano Chemicals (Pty) Limited against an earlier order dismissing an interim interdict in Part A. The court said the grounds of appeal would not yield a different outcome and dismissed the application with costs.
This may be relevant to parties following the litigation between Maano Chemicals and Rand Water and the other respondents.
Evidence from source
The applicant seeks leave to appeal this court’s judgment and order of 06 February 2026, dismissing an interim interdict (Part A).
Supports: plain_summary sentence 1
I find that none of the grounds of appeal relied on by the applicant will yield a different outcome in the contemplated appeal proceedings.
Supports: plain_summary sentence 2
the application stands to be dismissed with costs. I therefore make the following order: Order 1. The application is dismissed.
Supports: plain_summary sentence 2