This is an AI-generated summary of a selected monitored public legal source and may omit context. It is general information only, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for reading the source or consulting an attorney.
AI summary
The court dealt with an application for leave to appeal against its earlier judgment and order of 22 September 2025. It recorded that the applicant said the court had erred on compliance with sections 129 and 130 of the National Credit Act, the timing of summons, and related issues about default judgment and rescission. The application was dismissed, and costs were ordered on Scale A.
This appears to concern a leave to appeal application in a credit agreement dispute and the court’s treatment of rescission and NCA service issues.
Evidence from source
This is an application brought by the applicant for leave to appeal against the whole of this Court’s judgment and order handed down on 22 September 2025 to the Full Court.
Supports: Summary sentence 1
the respondent complied with sections 129 and 130 of the National Credit Act 1 (the NCA) regarding the delivery of the section 29 notice and the timing of the summons.
Supports: Summary sentence 2
Accordingly, the following order is made: 1. The application for leave to appeal is dismissed. 2. The applicant is to pay the respondent’s costs of this application on Scale A.
Supports: Summary sentence 3