This is an AI-generated summary of a selected monitored public legal source and may omit context. It is general information only, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for reading the source or consulting an attorney.
AI summary
The court dismissed an urgent application brought by Lungile Mloltshwa about the granting of a section 11 consent under the MPRDA. The judgment says the applicant had to exhaust internal remedies under section 96 of the MPRDA and that this was not done in the founding papers. The court also made costs orders against the applicant.
This judgment appears to concern urgency, internal appeal remedies under the MPRDA, and costs orders in a review challenge.
Evidence from source
The application, dated 26 May 2026, is dismissed.
Supports: Summary sentence 1: the application was dismissed.
The applicant was required to exhaust her internal remedies before bringing this application.
Supports: Summary sentence 2: internal remedies under section 96 had to be exhausted and were not addressed in the founding papers.
The applicant is to pay the costs of the application, which costs shall be paid as follows: a. The first to third respondent’s costs on the scale as between attorney and client
Supports: Summary sentence 3: the court made costs orders against the applicant.