This is an AI-generated summary of a selected monitored public legal source and may omit context. It is general information only, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for reading the source or consulting an attorney.
AI summary
The High Court dealt with an urgent application by Ms Mokhondo against Eskom about the restoration of electricity supply to her home in Hammanskraal. The court found that the matter was not urgent and struck the application from the urgent roll. It ordered that each party pay its own costs.
It may be relevant to urgent motion practice and disputes about electricity supply and alleged tampering.
Evidence from source
This is an opposed urgent application in which the applicant seeks final mandatory relief compelling the respondent to restore electricity supply to her residential property in Hammanskraal.
Supports: plain_summary sentence 1
The application is not urgent within the meaning of Rule 6(12).
Supports: plain_summary sentence 2
In the result, the following order is made: (i) The application is struck from the urgent roll for lack of urgency. (ii) Each party shall pay its own costs.
Supports: plain_summary sentence 3