This is an AI-generated summary of a selected monitored public legal source and may omit context. It is general information only, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for reading the source or consulting an attorney.
AI summary
The matter concerns a review of three Home Affairs decisions declaring the applicant a prohibited person under section 29(1)(f) of the Immigration Act. The court refused condonation for the late review application and dismissed the review. The judgment also discusses whether the later internal processes cured the initial lack of a chance to make representations.
This appears to concern review procedure, PAJA condonation, and Home Affairs decisions under the Immigration Act.
Evidence from source
The applicant's application for an extension of the 180-day period in terms of section 9 of the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000 is refused.
Supports: condonation refused and review dismissed
On 26 February 2020, that it could not find the permit number as it did not exist, and indicated that the permit is fraudulent. The same correspondence also informed the applicant that he was from that day rendered a prohibited person
Supports: explicit date and deadline-related event