The judgment concerns a Rule 43 application for interim relief pending divorce proceedings, including the primary residence and contact arrangements for two young children, maintenance, and a contribution towards legal costs. The court ordered that the children’s primary residence remain with the applicant, that the respondent’s contact be supervised, and made orders about child maintenance and costs. The applicant’s claims for spousal maintenance and R150 000 described as rehabilitative maintenance were dismissed.
It may be relevant to family law matters involving interim child arrangements, maintenance and Rule 43 cost contributions.
Evidence from source
This is an opposed application in terms of Uniform Rule 43 for interim relief pending the determination of divorce proceedings between the parties.
Supports: Supports the first sentence about the Rule 43 application and interim relief pending divorce.
The applicant’s claim for spousal maintenance is dismissed. 16. The applicant’s claim for R150 000 described as rehabilitative maintenance is dismissed.
Supports: Supports the third sentence about dismissed maintenance claims.