This is an AI-generated summary of a selected monitored public legal source and may omit context. It is general information only, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for reading the source or consulting an attorney.
AI summary
The court considered an application for condonation for the late delivery of a notice under section 3(1) of the Institution of Legal Proceedings against certain Organs of State Act. It held that the claim had prescribed and refused the condonation application, and it ordered the applicant to pay costs.
This appears to concern delayed notices under the Institution of Legal Proceedings against certain Organs of State Act and prescription timing in a damages claim.
Evidence from source
This is an application for condonation for the late filing of a notice in terms of section 3(4) of the Institution of Legal Proceedings against certain Organs of State Act (ILPACOSA).
Supports: plain_summary sentence 1
I find that condonation for the late filing of the section 3 notice is to be refused.
Supports: plain_summary sentence 2
The applicant is ordered to pay the costs of the respondent on the scale as between party and party, Scale B.
Supports: plain_summary sentence 2