This is an AI-generated summary of a selected monitored public legal source and may omit context. It is general information only, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for reading the source or consulting an attorney.
AI summary
The High Court considered an application under section 53(3) of POCA to rescind part of a forfeiture order granted on 21 June 2024. The court found that Mr Bonkondo was not in wilful default and set aside paragraph 1.5 of the forfeiture order. It also granted him leave to oppose the relief sought in that paragraph within 14 days.
This may be relevant to practitioners dealing with POCA preservation and forfeiture proceedings, particularly where rescission, notice, and opposition procedures are in issue.
Evidence from source
I am satisfied that it is clearly established that he was not in wilful default.
Supports: Summary sentence 2: the court found Mr Bonkondo was not in wilful default.