This is an AI-generated summary of a selected monitored public legal source and may omit context. It is general information only, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for reading the source or consulting an attorney.
AI summary
The judgment concerns a costs dispute after the parties settled the substantive issues in a matter against the Road Accident Fund. The court recorded that the applicant had sought an order compelling the Fund to make a decision under regulation 3(3)(dA) in relation to a RAF 4 serious injury assessment report, and ordered costs on the attorney and client scale with counsel’s costs on Scale A.
It may be relevant to practitioners handling Road Accident Fund matters and costs after settlement in applications about regulation 3(3)(dA).
Evidence from source
the court to determine that question, and its scale, on the papers and on argument from the bar.
Supports: plain_summary
The respondent is ordered to pay the applicant’s costs of this application on the scale as between attorney and client, such costs to include counsel’s costs on Scale A
Supports: plain_summary