This is an AI-generated summary of a selected monitored public legal source and may omit context. It is general information only, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for reading the source or consulting an attorney.
AI summary
The court considered an application to reopen a medical negligence trial after expert evidence had been led. It granted leave to reopen for Dr Coetzee to be called and Dr Lebos to be recalled on limited issues, but refused the recall of Dr Murray.
This appears to concern medical negligence litigation and the handling of expert evidence in a High Court trial.
Evidence from source
This application has been brought by the plaintiff to reopen the plaintiff’s case.
Supports: Summary sentence 1: the court considered an application to reopen a case.
The application by the plaintiff to reopen her case to call Dr Coetzee is granted.
Supports: Summary sentence 2: leave to reopen was granted for Dr Coetzee.
The application to recall Dr Murray is not granted.
Supports: Summary sentence 2: recall of Dr Murray was refused.