This is an AI-generated summary of a selected monitored public legal source and may omit context. It is general information only, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for reading the source or consulting an attorney.
AI summary
The High Court in Johannesburg heard an application by Primall Media for leave to appeal against an order dismissing its application to dismiss iPoint Marketing’s counterclaim for want of prosecution. The court found the order appealable, but dismissed the leave to appeal application and ordered Primall to pay the costs.
This appears to concern leave to appeal, dismissal for want of prosecution, and the court's approach to delay and prejudice under section 34 and section 173.
Evidence from source
This is an application by Primall Media (Pty) Ltd (“Primall”) for leave to appeal against paragraph 1 of the order granted 22 April 2026, in terms of which I dismissed Primall’s application to dismiss iPoint Marketing CC’s (“iPoint”) counte
Supports: Plain summary sentence 1
The application for leave to appeal is accordingly dismissed, with costs to follow the result.
Supports: Plain summary sentence 2