This is an AI-generated summary of a selected monitored public legal source and may omit context. It is general information only, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for reading the source or consulting an attorney.
AI summary
The court considered an application for leave to appeal against a prior judgment and order in Saaiman v Kirsten. The application was opposed, and the judgment refers to the requirements in section 17(1) of the Superior Courts Act.
This may be relevant to litigants following leave to appeal procedure and the section 17(1) test referred to in the judgment.
Evidence from source
In this matter the applicant applies for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal, alternatively, to a full Court, of this division, against the whole of my judgment and order handed down on 22 April 2026.
Supports: plain_summary sentence 1
The application for leave to appeal is opposed by the respondent.
Supports: plain_summary sentence 1