This is an AI-generated summary of a selected monitored public legal source and may omit context. It is general information only, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for reading the source or consulting an attorney.
AI summary
The High Court in Johannesburg considered an opposed application for further and better discovery in a divorce matter. It recorded the parties’ discovery disputes and made an order requiring further responses for specified items, together with inspection of certain documents at the auditors’ offices.
It may be relevant to family law and civil litigation practitioners dealing with discovery disputes in divorce proceedings.
Evidence from source
The respondents are directed to provide responses that comply with the provisions of Rule 35(3) and Rule 35(6) in respect of items 2, 3, 14, 20.1, 31, 34, 36, 42, 43, 45, 46, 51, 55, 56 and 65
Supports: plain_summary sentence 2
Date of judgment: 8 June 2026
Supports: deadline_detected and deadline_date