This is an AI-generated summary of a selected monitored public legal source and may omit context. It is general information only, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for reading the source or consulting an attorney.
AI summary
The Supreme Court of Appeal considered a review of a Taxing Master’s allocatur under rule 17(3) of the SCA rules. The Court said the applicants had not shown that disputed items relating to reconsideration-related work were properly before it for review, and it dismissed the taxation review with costs.
This appears to concern taxation review procedure and the scope of review under rule 17(3).
Evidence from source
The taxation review is dismissed with costs.
Supports: Summary of the outcome.
This is a review of the Taxing Master’s allocatur dated 5 March 2026, brought under rule 17 of the Supreme Court of Appeal Rules (the SCA rules).
Supports: Summary of the subject matter and procedure.