This is an AI-generated summary of a selected monitored public legal source and may omit context. It is general information only, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for reading the source or consulting an attorney.
AI summary
The Supreme Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal by Smada Security Services against the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development. The matter concerned a review of a tender award for guarding, protective and close protection security services in Gauteng Cluster A under PAJA. The court found that the appellant had not established a reviewable mistake of fact or irrationality on the part of the respondent.
This appears to concern tender review disputes and PAJA grounds in public procurement.
Evidence from source
The appeal is dismissed with costs.
Supports: Outcome of the appeal
challenge based on an alleged material error of fact — reliance on s 6(2) (e) (iii) and 6 (2) (f) (ii) (cc) of the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000
Supports: Summary of the legal issue