This is an AI-generated summary of a selected monitored public legal source and may omit context. It is general information only, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for reading the source or consulting an attorney.
AI summary
The Supreme Court of Appeal dealt with an application to vary an earlier costs order made in the same matter. It amended paragraph 3(a) of the 26 March 2024 order to add words saying the costs are to be paid by the defendants jointly and severally, the one paying the other to be absolved. The rest of the variation application was dismissed, and no costs order was made for the variation application.
This may be relevant to parties following the costs wording in the underlying appeal and the later variation of that order.
Evidence from source
The application for variation of the order is otherwise dismissed. 3 There is no order in regard to the costs of the application for variation of the original order.
Supports: Summary sentence 3 about dismissal of the rest of the application and no costs order.