This is an AI-generated summary of a selected monitored public legal source and may omit context. It is general information only, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for reading the source or consulting an attorney.
AI summary
The judgment concerns an application for leave to appeal against an earlier interim order. The court dismissed the application and ordered the applicants to pay the respondent’s costs. The judgment also refers to the interim order restraining certain conduct and to arguments about authority, urgency, and appealability.
It may be relevant to appeals, urgent interdicts, and Communal Property Association disputes.
Evidence from source
This matter appeared before me on August 6, 2026, as an application for Leave to Appeal against judgment granted ex tempore on July 7, 2026 .
Supports: plain_summary: the judgment concerns an application for leave to appeal against an earlier interim order
1. Application for Leave to Appeal is dismissed. 2. The applicant is to pay respondent’s costs on a party-to-party scale, including costs of counsel on scale B .
Supports: plain_summary: the application was dismissed and costs were ordered
The essence of the interim order is that the applicants are restrained and interdicted from:
Supports: plain_summary: the judgment refers to the earlier interim order