This is an AI-generated summary of a selected monitored public legal source and may omit context. It is general information only, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for reading the source or consulting an attorney.
AI summary
The court dealt with an urgent application by Zap Hub (Pty) Ltd against the Property Practitioners Regulatory Authority. The judgment says the applicant complained about the way the regulatory regime was being applied in the property practitioners' industry and sought final relief, including orders relating to Property24, Booking.com and Airbnb. The application was struck from the roll for want of urgency, with costs.
This may be relevant to property practitioners and online property platform operators mentioned in the application.
Evidence from source
The applicant is a property practitioner licensed by the first respondent, the Property Practitioners Regulatory Authority.
Supports: plain_summary sentence 1
it claims final relief, declaring that to be so and directing the first respondent to enforce the regulatory regime
Supports: plain_summary sentence 2
The application is struck from the roll for want of urgency, with costs.
Supports: plain_summary sentence 3