This is an AI-generated summary of a selected monitored public legal source and may omit context. It is general information only, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for reading the source or consulting an attorney.
AI summary
The High Court gave reasons for refusing an application for leave to appeal against a costs order made after an urgent application was struck from the roll. The court said there was no defined constitutional issue on the papers, the matter was commercial in nature, and no factual basis had been laid for urgency.
This may be relevant to parties dealing with costs orders after urgent commercial litigation and to those considering reliance on Biowatch in costs disputes.
Evidence from source
I refused, with costs, an application for leave to appeal against the costs order I granted in this matter on 9 June 2026.
Supports: plain_summary sentence 1
it was a case in which no factual basis was laid at all for the proposition that the applicant could not secure redress at a hearing in the ordinary course.
Supports: plain_summary sentence 2