This is an AI-generated summary of a selected monitored public legal source and may omit context. It is general information only, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for reading the source or consulting an attorney.
AI summary
The judgment concerns two consolidated applications to amend particulars of claim in damages actions against the City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality. The Court found that the proposed amendment did not comply with Rule 18(10) and dismissed the applications with costs.
This may be relevant to civil litigation and pleadings practice, particularly where damages claims and amendment applications are being dealt with under Rules 18 and 28.
Evidence from source
This is an interlocutory application brought in terms of Rule 28(4), wherein both Applicants are seeking leave of Court to authorise the amendment of particulars of claim.
Supports: plain_summary sentence 1
The application for leave to amend is dismissed with costs.
Supports: plain_summary sentence 2